浙江工商大学学报

当代中国的协商治理实践既展现出制度逻辑导向的现代协商治理范式，又在与差序格局的互适中呈现出传统治理资源的现代转化。差序协商是指植根于中国乡土社会，以利益相关者的内生需求为逻辑起点，依托差序格局的关系网络进行议题筛选与动员，并通过“中人”转译与科层吸纳实现治理资源双向配置的本土化协商治理模式。差序协商不仅是一种理论构想，而且在议题特征、行动主体和协商场域等方面呈现出稳定且可识别的典型特征。差序协商的生成依赖于议题确立、过程推进与结果落地三个环节持续受到圈层结构的筛选和枢纽节点的调适。差序协商的理论价值远不止于对本土实践现象的概念抽象，具有更为丰富的自主知识意涵，实现了从二元对立到系统共生的视角转换，化解了治理有效与理论无效的无谓辩论，拓展了协商治理自主知识的生产空间。

The practice of deliberative governance in contemporary China not only manifests a modern paradigm oriented by institutional logic but also demonstrates the modern transformation of traditional governance resources through its mutual adaptation to the chaxu geju(differential mode of association).Chaxu deliberation refers to an indigenous model of deliberative governance rooted in China's rural society.It takes the endogenous needs of stakeholders as its logical starting point,relies on the relational networks embedded in the chaxu geju for issue screening and mobilization,and achieves a two-way allocation of governance resources through the translation role of "intermediaries"(zhongren) and absorption by bureaucratic systems.Chaxu deliberation is not merely a theoretical construct;it exhibits stable and identifiable characteristics in terms of issue attributes,actors,and deliberative arenas.Its formation depends on the continuous filtering by the concentric-circle structure and the adjustments made at pivotal nodes across three key stages:issue identification,process facilitation,and outcome implementation.The theoretical value of Chaxu deliberation extends far beyond the conceptual abstraction of local practices.It carries richer implications for autonomous knowledge production—facilitating a perspective shift from binary opposition to systemic symbiosis,resolving the unproductive debate between governance effectiveness and theoretical inadequacy,and expanding the space for producing autonomous knowledge in deliberative governance.