87 | 0 | 29 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
唐宋变革期陆上丝绸之路的存续问题因考古新发现取得重要突破。传统观点认为党项政权崛起导致西北交通梗阻,将此时期视为陆上丝路“断裂期”。近年来耀州青瓷在丝路沿线的系统性出土说明耀州瓷在官方往来减少的背景下,通过新的路线和草原丝绸之路延续贸易。以耀州青瓷为代表的民间贸易维系了跨区域经济联系的同时,耀州窑历经了唐至宋的技术演进。文章从物质文化视角出发,采用三重复合论证模型——通过原料产地和窑口分布、窑具演变追踪技术传播轨迹、器型纹饰比较的审美互动机制研究,揭示了北宋时期陆上丝路呈现的“官退民进”商贸转型特征。该研究不仅为丝路延续性提供实证支撑,更为理解唐宋时期欧亚大陆技术传播与贸易流动的微观图景提供了新视角。
Abstract:The issue of the survival of the overland Silk Road during the transition period of the Tang and Song Dynasties has witnessed critical breakthroughs due to new archaeological discoveries. The traditional view holds that the rise of the Tangut regime from the 10th to the 13th century led to the obstruction of transportation in the northwest, and this period is regarded as the “fracture period” of the overland Silk Road. In recent years, the systematic excavation of Yaozhou celadon along the Silk Road has provided relevant physical evidence indicating that Yaozhou porcelain formed new trade routes through the overland Silk Road and the grassland Silk Road against the backdrop of reduced exchanges of official envoys. While the folk trade represented by Yaozhou celadon maintained cross-regional economic ties, the Yaozhou kiln underwent technological evolution from the Tang to the Song Dynasties. From the perspective of material culture, this paper adopts a triple composite demonstration model, through the study of the aesthetic interaction mechanism of raw material origin and kiln distribution, kiln furniture evolution tracking technology dissemination trajectory, and vessel shape and pattern comparison, it attempts to reveal the commercial transformation characteristics of “official retreat and civilian advancement” presented by the overland Silk Road during the Northern Song Dynasty. This research not only provides empirical support for the continuity of the Silk Road, but also reconstructs the micro-picture of technology dissemination and trade flows on the Eurasian continent during the Tang and Song dynasties.
[1]杨蕤.回鹘时代:10—13世纪陆上丝绸之路贸易研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2015:128-135.
[2]杨蕤.北宋时期陆上丝路贸易初探[J].西域研究,2003(3):33-38.
[3]伍辉.跨文化交流视域下西方的中国形象变迁研究(公元前5世纪至17世纪)[D].山东:山东大学历史文化学院,2023.
[4]吕超,吴玘玥.丝绸之路与中华民族交往交流交融——基于物质交往视角[J].贵州民族研究,2024(6):69-76.
[5]李鹏,张沐可.陆上丝绸之路行旅的生命史考察[J].学术研究,2024(8):133-143.
[6]长泽和俊.“丝绸之路”研究的回顾与展望[J].国外社会科学,1978(5):85-89.
[7]长泽和俊.丝绸之路史研究[M].钟美珠,译.天津:天津古籍出版社,1990:274-307.
[8]董书旭,李航.漫谈陕西黄堡窑场的历史兴废——以耀州窑青瓷发展脉络为主线[J].美术文献,2018(11):33-34.
[9]袁兴,任肇,刘宗明.基于文献计量分析的1949—2023年中国耀州瓷研究[J].中国陶瓷工业,2024(5):53-60.
[10]FORSTER N, GRAVE P, VICKERY N, et al. Non-destructive Analysis Using PXRF:Methodology and Application to Archaeological Ceramics[J]. X-Ray Spectrometry, 2011, 40(5):389-398.
[11]WEN R, WANG D, WANG L H, et al. The Colouring Mechanism of the Brown Glaze Porcelain of the Yaozhou Kiln in the Northern Song Dynasty[J]. Ceramic International, 2019, 45(8):10589-10595.
[12]WANG T, HOLE C, REN Z, et al. Morphological Andstructural Study of Crystals in Black-to-b Rown Glazes of Yaozhou Ware(Song Dynasty)Using Imaging and Spectroscopic Techniques[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2021,41(12):6049-6058.
[13]陕西省考古研究所,耀州窑博物馆.宋代耀州窑址[M].北京:文物出版社,1998:4.
[14]邢福来,肖健一,田亚岐,等.陕西南北朝隋唐及宋元明清考古五十年综述[J].考古与文物,2008(6):161-197.
[15]李坤,王小蒙. 10世纪耀州窑生产转型及技术渊源——从M形匣钵说起[J].中原文物,2020(4):71-77.
[16]禚振西.柴窑探微[J].收藏家,2001(8):2-9.
[17]郑建明.五代至北宋时期耀州窑青瓷分期研究——以纪年材料为中心[J].东南文化,2022(6):100-114
[18]任志录.中国早期镶嵌瓷的考察[J].文物,2007(11):74-90.
[19]赵东海.中国东北地区西汉至辽代外来文化遗物研究[D].吉林:吉林大学考古学院,2024.
[20]彭善国,刘辉.东北、内蒙古出土的耀州窑青瓷——以墓葬材料为中心[J].考古与文物,2015(1):108-117.
[21]杜文.金代耀州窑陶瓷文献综述[J].碑林集刊,2006(1):265-271.
[22]胡松梅.陕西长安杜回北宋孟氏家族墓地[J].艺术品鉴,2021(7):84-89.
[23]秦大树.埃及福斯塔特遗址中发现的中国陶瓷[J].海交史研究,1995(1):79-91.
[24]张然,翟毅.古代中国与伊朗南部地区陶瓷贸易管窥——以安德鲁·乔治·威廉姆森的调查为中心[J].故宫博物院院刊,2019(7):13-23.
[25]沈德符.万历野获编[M].杨万里,校点.上海:上海古籍出版社,2012:660.
[26]李其江,吴军明,张茂林,等.《陶冶图说》制瓷技术理论化的特点及价值[J].陶瓷学报,2012(1):104-107.
基本信息:
DOI:10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1337/c.2025.04.004
中图分类号:F752.9;K876.3;K244;J527
引用信息:
[1]赵小芳,刘宗明.耀州青瓷与北宋陆上丝路延续性的互证研究[J].浙江工商大学学报,2025,No.193(04):32-40.DOI:10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1337/c.2025.04.004.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金艺术学项目“长城沿线(京冀晋)传统民居建筑文化基因谱图及当代价值研究”(24BG160)