浙江工商大学学报

新修订的《中华人民共和国监察法实施条例》将初步核实调整至线索处置章节下，标志着其立法定位的理性回归。据此，初步核实的价值目标、程序构造和行权逻辑理应发生新的转变。然而，具体的程序规则与措施配置并未根据这一立法定位进行同步调整。实践中，初步核实仍存在启动标准模糊、程序期限阙如、措施权限失衡和监督救济虚置等一系列失序困境。破解之道在于，在理念层面，应彻底摒弃“调查准备”的思维定式，从“权力中心”转为“权利本位”;在规则层面，依据比例原则，对启动标准、程序期限以及措施权限等关键节点进行精细化的规则续造，并构建内外结合的监督与救济机制，从而回应与落实初步核实定位回归的立法意图。

The newly revised Regulations on the Implementation of the Supervision Law of the People's Republic of China relocate preliminary verification to the chapter on case lead handling,marking a rational return to its proper legislative positioning.Accordingly,the value objectives,procedural structure,and logic governing the exercise of power in preliminary verification should undergo corresponding transformations.However,the specific procedural rules and the configuration of measures have not been adjusted in tandem with this legislative repositioning.In practice,preliminary verification still faces a series of systemic disorders,including ambiguous initiation standards,the absence of procedural time limits,an imbalance in the authority to employ measures,and the ineffectiveness of oversight and remedy mechanisms.The solution lies,at the conceptual level,in thoroughly abandoning the entrenched mindset of "preparation for investigation" and shifting from a powercentered approach to a rights-oriented one.At the rule level,in accordance with the principle of proportionality,it requires the refined reconstruction of key procedural nodes such as initiation standards,procedural time limits,and the authority to employ measures, together with the establishment of integrated internal and external oversight and remedy mechanisms,so as to respond to and implement the legislative intent behind the restored positioning of preliminary verification.