浙江工商大学学报

技术性偏差的规则应是数字时代刑事司法现代化的核心议题。电子数据鉴真的法律规制转型需涵盖区块链存证的不可篡改特性、算法验证的技术中立原则、司法认知与技术理性的融合机制等价值基准。以技术规制理性为尺度检视，当前鉴真体系存在区块链存证司法认定标准缺位、算法验证程序规范空白、技术性偏差归责路径模糊、电子数据鉴真过度依赖技术供应商以及算法黑箱导致的质证障碍等问题。为此，应当围绕技术可控与规则适配的目标，从算法鉴真的法律规制原则确立、算法鉴真的具体法律规则设计以及区块链与算法技术在电子数据鉴真中的协同应用规则三个层面来实现技术性偏差的规则治理。

Responding to technological deviations through regulation constitutes a central issue in the modernization of criminal justice in the digital age. The transformation of legal regulation for the authentication of electronic data must encompass such value benchmarks as the tamper-proof nature of blockchain-based preservation, the principle of technological neutrality in algorithm verification, and mechanisms for integrating judicial awareness with technical rationality. When examined against the criterion of regulatory rationality in technology, the current authentication system reveals several problems: the absence of judicial standards for blockchain-based evidence preservation, gaps in procedural norms for algorithm verification, unclear pathways for attributing liability for technological deviations, over-reliance on technical suppliers in electronic data authentication, and obstacles to cross-examination arising from algorithmic “black boxes.” Accordingly, aiming for both technological controllability and regulatory adaptability, the governance of technological deviations through rules should be achieved through three dimensions: establishing legal regulatory principles for algorithmic authentication, designing specific legal rules for algorithmic authentication, and formulating collaborative application rules for integrating blockchain and algorithmic technologies in the authentication of electronic data.