| 808 | 0 | 56 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
新《公司法》强化了公司利益的保护。本质上,公司利益是公司作为团体性组织所享有的一种独立的综合性利益,是公司中各利益相关者之间比较性利益。公司利益不仅是公司法解释论的出发点之一,而且承载着维护法人人格独立、完善公司治理以及作为判断公司董事、监事、高级管理人员及控股股东是否违反信义义务的法律依据之功能。在利益冲突理论视角下,公司利益规则也是各种冲突解决的标准。公司实体理论是公司利益保护的法理基础,以此为前提,公司利益与其他利益相关者利益博弈,根据相关主体利益的类型和保护位次确定以何者利益保护为优先。基于公司利益的特点,公司利益的保护应当更多依赖市场经济条件下的自然法则,并应完善基于公司利益冲突规则的保护模式。
Abstract：The new Company Law strengthens the protection of corporate interests. In essence corporate interest is a kind of independent comprehensive comparative rights and interests as well as a coordination mechanism for conflicts of interest. The mechanism of corporate interest is not only a kind of interpretation tool but also carries the function of maintaining the independence of legal personality perfecting corporate governance and serving as the legal basis for judging the violation of obligations by directors supervisors senior management and controlling shareholders of the company and in the system of conflict of interest rules the rules of corporate interest are also the standard of various conflict resolution. The difference of the specific practice of the company determines the huge difference of the company law of each country and our company law of the mixed succession determines the company.s interest in judging more complex as a conflict of interest its balance and adjustment is not ordinary civil law norms can be realized. Based on the nature of the company.s interests the company law objectively becomes the basic law to protect the company.s interests. The protection of corporate interests should rely more on the natural law under the conditions of market economy and establish a protection model based on the rules of corporate conflicts of interest.
[1]邓峰.公司利益缺失下的利益冲突规则———基于法律文本和实践的反思[J].法学家,2009(4):79-88.
[2]张世明.反不正当竞争法保护客体辩说[J].政法论丛,2024(4):16-31.
[3]李诗鸿.公司契约理论新发展及其缺陷的反思[J].华东政法大学学报,2014(5):83-99.
[4]蒋大兴,沈晖.公司利益不确定性的控制机制[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022(6):74-84.
[5]曾祥生.股东失权制度研究[J].法学杂志,2024(6):72-85.
[6]克拉克曼,汉斯曼,阿莫,等.公司法剖析:比较与功能的视角[M]. 2版.罗培新,译.北京:法律出版社,2012.
[7]JOHNSON L. Law and Legal Theory in the History of Corporate Responsibility Corporote Personhood[J]. Seattle University Law Review 2012 35 4 1135-1164.
[8]万国华,张崇胜.公司利益类型界定与保护法律问题研究[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(3):100-108.
[9]GINDIS D. From Fictions and Aggregates to Real Entities in the Theory of the Firm[J]. Journal of Institutional Economics 2009 5 1 25-46.
[10]RAZ A. A Purpose-Based Theory of Corporate Law[J]. Villanova Law Review 2020 65 3 523-584.
[11]奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].陈郁,郭宇峰,李崇新,译.上海:格致出版社,2014.
[12]杨国荣.中国传统思想中的权利问题[J].探索与争鸣,2024(11):71-77.
[13]刘俊海.论新《公司法》第88条第1款的溯及力之争:兼议历史股东的出资责任[J].河北学刊,2025(4):11-24.
[14]沈晖.公司利益的法律解释[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2023:148-149.
[15]EASTERBROOK F H FISCHEL D R. Close Corporations and Agency Costs[J]. Stanford Law Review 1986 38 2271-301.
[16]李飞.英美法上董事对公司债权人的义务———以实务见解与理论评析展开[J].私法研究,2011(1):68-146.
[17]于莹,申玮.禁止财务资助规则中“公司利益”解释论[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2025(3):105-113.
[18]甘培忠,周游.公司利益保护的裁判现实与理性反思[J].法学杂志,2014(3):69-75.
[19]唐林垚.公司法如何促进模型可信与价值对齐[J].东方法学,2024(2):76-87.
[20]杨大可.德国法上的公司利益及其对我国的启示[J].清华法学,2019(4):163-180.
[21]林少伟.公司目的新型模式之提出[J].荆楚法学,2022(3):18-31.
[22]方流芳.公司词义考:解读语词的制度信息———“公司”一词在中英早期交往中的用法和所指[J].中外法学,2000(3):277-299.
[23]SEAVOY R E. The Origins of the American Business Corporation 1784-1855 Broadening the Concept of Public Service During Industrialization[M]. Westport Greenwood Press 1982 3.
[24]DAVIS J S. Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations[M]. Cambridge Harvard University Press 191734.
[25]ROY W G. Socializing Capital The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America[M]. Princeton Princeton University Press 1997 3.
[26]SEAVOY R E. Laws to Encourage Manufacturing New York Policy and the 1811 General Incorporation Statute[J]. The Business History Review 1972 46 1 85-95.
[27]FRIEDMAN L M. A History of American Law[M]. 2nd ed. New York Simon&Schuster 1985 525.
[28]林少伟.公司目的之演变与制度实现[J].法治研究,2023(4):18-32.
[29]FISCH J E SOLOMON S D. Should Corporations Have a Purpose[J]. Texas Law Review 2021 99 7 1309-1346.
[30]邓峰.公司利益缺失下的利益冲突规则———基于法律文本和实践的反思[J].法学家,2009(4):79-88.
[31] IWAI K. Persons Things and Corporations The Corporate Personality Controversy and Comparative Corporate Governance[J]. American Journal of Cooperation Law 1999 47 4 583-632.
[32]唐林垚.公司利益的内涵归正与公司治理的规则调适[J].清华法学,2025(2):209-224.
[33]LEE Y S. Reconciling Corporate Interests with Broader Social Interests-Pursuit of Corporate Interests beyond Shareholder Primacy[J]. William&Mary Business Law Review 2022 14 1 1-62.
[34]STOUT L A. The Toxic Side Effects of Shareholder Primacy[J]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2013161 7 2003-2023.
[35]SMITH N C R?NNEGARD D. Shareholder Primacy Corporate Social Responsibility and the Role of Business Schools[J].Journal of Business Ethics 2016 134 3 463-478.
[36]吕凌燕,李辰琛.公司董事对第三人责任的限缩适用[J].江汉论坛,2025(10):122-128.
[37]WELCH E P SAUNDERS R S. Freedom and Its Limits in the Delaware General Corporation Law[J]. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 2008 33 3 845-868.
[38]伯利,米恩斯.现代公司与私有财产[M].甘华鸣,罗锐韧,蔡如海,译.北京:商务印书馆,2005:78.
[39]冯果.整体主义视角下公司法的理念调适与体系重塑[J].中国法学,2021(2):61-83.
[40]周游.公司法上的两权分离之反思[J].中国法学,2017(4):285-303.
[41]黄辉.现代公司法比较研究:国际经验及对中国的启示[M]. 2版.北京:清华大学出版社,2020:240-241.
[42]李晓明.董事第三人责任的理论因应与规范适用[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025(1):48-53.
[43]赵玲.公司“控制人”信义义务规则的创设及适用研究[J].法学杂志,2024(2):160-172.
[44]邹海林.公司法上的董事义务及其责任配置[J].法律适用,2024(2):43-56.
[45]冯琴.商业判断规则在我国的适用研究[J].财经法学,2023(6):64-77.
[46]周淳.公司归入权的体系定位与规范构造[J].财经法学,2021(3):34-48.
[47]熊伟.事物本质、领域区分与领域法的特性透视[J].政法论丛,2024(1):15-25.
[48]RAZ A. Why Corporate Law Is Private Law[J]. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law 2023 25 4 981-1018.
基本信息:
中图分类号:D922.291.91
引用信息:
[1]刘道远,刘雅洁.利益冲突理论视域下公司利益保护研究[J].浙江工商大学学报().
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“数字化背景下国际金融服务的法律治理体系研究”(22&ZD203)
2025-12-25
2025-12-25
2025-12-25