浙江工商大学学报

穿透式检察监督是检察机关顺应数字时代变革，创新参与社会治理，依托大数据与人工智能技术，以社会治理检察建议为保障所形成的新型检察监督范式。相较于传统检察监督，这一范式在指导理念、价值目标、运行场域和监督手段上具有显著优势，但同时也存在理念偏颇、边界扩张、程序虚置、成本失控等风险。这些风险不仅削弱了穿透式检察监督的质效，还对现行法治架构和法治生态构成潜在侵蚀。为引导穿透式检察监督的有序发展，实现检察机关两种职能定位的内在协调，应当将依法能动法律监督观确立为指导理念，以诉讼监督、事后监督为依托，一般监督、预防性监督为延伸，通过比例原则限制检察监督的权力边界。同时，有必要引入技术性正当程序理论，对大数据法律监督模型的建构予以全流程规制。

Penetrating procuratorial supervision is a new paradigm of procuratorial supervision formed by prosecutorial authorities in response to the transformations of the digital age. It represents an innovative form of participation in social governance, relying on big data and artificial intelligence technologies and secured by procuratorial suggestions for social governance. Compared with traditional procuratorial supervision, this paradigm offers significant advantages in terms of guiding philosophy, value objectives, operational arenas, and supervisory means. However, it also faces risks such as conceptual deviation, boundary expansion, procedural hollowing, and loss of cost control. These risks not only undermine the quality and effectiveness of penetrating procuratorial supervision but also pose potential erosion to the existing rule-of-law framework and ecosystem. To guide the orderly development of penetrating procuratorial supervision and achieve internal coordination between the two functional orientations of procuratorial authorities, the concept of law-based, proactive legal supervision should be established as the guiding philosophy. This approach should rely on intra-litigation supervision and ex post supervision, with extra-litigation supervision and preventive supervision as extensions, while limiting the power boundaries of procuratorial supervision through the principle of proportionality. At the same time, it is necessary to introduce the theory of technical due process to regulate the entire process of constructing big data legal supervision models.