浙江工商大学学报

价值判断构成数字司法的核心挑战。价值判断是人们在价值上追求理解和认同的活动,需要以人的主体性地位为前提。知识图谱、深度学习、价值数据库的构建和应用,构成价值判断数字化的可行路径。立法者的价值判断、法律专家的价值判断、既往法官的价值判断,被转化为法律大模型的机器判断,为人类法官提供审判参考和偏离预警。通过数字技术“赋能”司法裁判,一方面可以提高司法效率,限制法官的恣意裁量,保障裁判尺度的统一;另一方面也存在适用限度,需要在人类法官主导的司法裁判格局之下发挥辅助作用。数字司法的建设与完善,应当以技术稳妥性为前提,坚持科技向善原则,将“自上而下的战略统筹”和“自下而上的试验推广”结合起来,兼顾司法公正和效率、法的安定性与认知开放,切实保障人民群众共享数字时代的技术红利和在每一个司法案件中的公平正义感受。

Value judgment constitutes the core challenge of digital justice. Value judgment is an activity in which people seek understanding and recognition on a value level requiring the premise of human subjectivity. The construction and application of knowledge graphs deep learning and value databases form feasible pathways for the digitization of value judgment. Digital Justice transforms the value judgments of legislators legal experts and past judges into machine judgments.of legal models providing trial references and deviation warnings for human judges. One one hand empowering judicial.adjudication with digital technology can enhance judicial efficiency limit judges arbitrary discretion and ensure uniform adjudication standards. On the other hand there are applicable limits necessitating an auxiliary role within the judicial adjudication framework dominated by human judges. The development and improvement of digital justice should take.technological stability as a prerequisite adhering to the principle of Tech for good combining top-down strategic planning.with bottom-up experimental promotion balancing judicial fairness and efficiency legal stability and cognitive openness and effectively ensuring that the public enjoys the technological goods of the digital era and perceives fairness and justice in every judicial case.